Scottish History - The House of Stewart
James VI of Scotland, I of England Part 4 of 4
James VI (1567 - 1603) - Part 4
George Villiers
The Earl of Buckingham and then the Duke of Buckingham next held sway
over James. He was more dangerous than Carr had been because he was more
intelligenet and played a larger role in matters of state. The King was
becoming less and less active in government and Buckingham used his influence
to make money for himself and his family. He flattered the King outrageously.
James to his council in 1617 said, "You may be sure that I love
the Earl of Buckingham mroe than anyone else, and more than you who are
here assembled." It is said that "James fell for Buckingham
completely and the relationship became very deep." Buckingham wrote
to James saying,
"I naturally so love your person and adore all your other parts,
which are more than ever one man had, that were not only all your people
but all the world besides set together on one side and you alone on the
other, I should to obey and please you, displease, nay, despite them
all."
Now, this does not say that James had a sexual relationship with Villiers,
but it certainly does suggest it.
Buckingham encouraged James to grant monopolies in trade. This brought
in a fortune for the person who had the monopoly and a lot of money for
the Crown. However, it did increase prices as there was no competition.
His money problems continued. Sir Walter Raleigh had been in the tower
under a sentence of death for a long time but had been to Guiana and
felt there was gold there. James decided he would send Raleigh on an
expedition to find the gold but it was not to be. Raleigh became ill
and his second in command attacked the Spanish who had a colony there,
even though they had been instructed by James not to attack the Spanish.
The expedition came home without any gold. James had Raleigh beheaded
under the original sentence, thereby making Raleigh a martyr.
Trouble Abroad
James in his dealing with other countries had tried to follow the policy
of friendship with both Catholic and Protestant countries. James wanted
to link England with both sides. He had married his daughter to Frederick
of the Palantine and wanted to marry Charles to the Spanish Infanta.
The Catholics and Protestants in Bohemia became entangled in a fight
and the Protestants asked Frederick to be King of Bohemia.
He asked James
for advise, but James as was his nature was indecisive. Frederick did
accept the crown. This meant that he was taking on Austria and Spain
on his own and he did not have the army, the experience or the power
to do so. British support was vital to Frederick but the Spanish ambassador
held the carrot of a marriage between the Infanta and Charles out to
James. So was he to support his son-in-law or Spain? He believed in
the sanctity of Kings, remember, and, therefore, was upset with the overthrow
of the King of Bohemia in favour of his son-in-law. Frederick actually
only lasted as King for a year and earned the nickname of the King
of one Winter.
Parliament believed that the Spanish threat to England
needed to be resisted and James finally agreed. However, they appropriated
too little money for James for an expedition to fight on Frederick's
side, and he accepted it, not asking for more. James hesitated in sending
troops and began peace talks with Spain as a mediator. Once again he
changed his mind and decided that he must be on Frederick's side. He
asked Parliament for more money but they refused, which, of course,
enraged James. After charges on both sides, James dissolved the Parliament
and thus ended Frederick's chance of help from England.
Betrothal of Charles
James was becoming senile at this time. He has been suggested that he
suffered from a medical condition called "porphyria," apparently
a disease which weakens the mind. (Dr. Roy can tell us what it is.) He
could not concentrate. Queen Anne had died and since his daughter was
abroad, he looked to the family of Buckingham for companionship. Buckingham
and the Spanish ambassador were working together. James decided that
now Charles should be betrothed to the Spanish Infanta hoping that the
Spanish would help restore Frederick to the Palantinate (a part of Germany).
To Spain for the Betrothal
The Spanish ambassador persuaded Charles to go to Spain in person. He
did go and took Buckingham with him. The Spanish thought that if Charles
were there in person they could talk him into terms that would be favourable
to Spain. This was unrealistic because any sort of terms that were too
one-sided would not be approved by Parliament. The ambassador thought
unrealistically that if he could convert Charles to Catholicism then
the whole country would convert. Buckingham and Charles went to Madrid
and were there for six months. The Spanish dragged out the negotiations.
Also, Charles, because of Spanish custom, could not be with the Infanta
alone. The Spanish in their demands wanted to reverse the laws imposed
on Catholics in England so that Catholics would no longer have to swear
allegiance. Charles agreed to their terms because he thought he could
go back on his word when he returned to England.
James was afraid that the Spanish would keep Charles as a hostage. He
agreed to the terms the Spanish had demanded and the marriage contract
was signed. However, Charles did not marry the Infanta. He and Buckingham
kept arguing about the terms. Finally Buckingham's bad manners and temper
became more than the Spanish could bear. Charles and Buckingham returned
to London and the marriage never took place, although the contract had
been signed and the marriage could have taken place by proxy. The English
people were happy that they did not have a Spanish Queen and Charles
and Buckingham became popular figures with the people. They took over
ruling in James' place.
Death of James
James died in 1625. The doctors at the time thought it was not life-threatening
but James would not heed their advice and drank large amounts of cold
beer to dilute his fever. He would not let them minister to him because
of his fear of pain. There is some suggestion that he was poisoned but
no proof.
James certainly was not the worst King that England had. During his
reign, the arts and sciences and education flourished and his was a reign
of tolerance. He was a generous man, probably due to the fact that he
had such a lonely childhood that he wanted people to like him.
Two quotes seem to sum up his reign:
Arthur Wilson's epitaph on James:
"Peace was maintained by him as in the time of Augustus and
peace begot plenty, and plenty begot ease and wantonness."
The Venetian ambassador's comments on James in 1607:
"He is Sovereign in name and in appearance rather than in substance
and effect. This is the result of his deliberate choice, for he is capable
of governing, being a Prince of intelligence and culture above the common,
thanks to his applications to and pleasure in study when he was young,
though he has now abandoned that pursuit altogether."
James VI (1567 - 1603) - Part 4
|